·4 min read
MVP Scope Creep: How to Prevent It
Scope creep is the #1 killer of MVP timelines and budgets. Here's how it sneaks in and how to stop it.
How Scope Creep Happens
- •"While we're at it, let's also add..."
- •Competitor launches a feature you don't have
- •User feedback before launch (you haven't validated anything yet)
- •Stakeholder has a new idea
- •Developer suggests "improvements"
- •Fear that the MVP isn't enough
Warning Signs
- •Feature list growing after week 1
- •Moving deadlines
- •Budget conversations getting uncomfortable
- •Original problem getting fuzzy
- •Discussing features for "later" during MVP phase
Prevention Tactics
Before You Start
- •Define MVP scope in writing, signed off by everyone
- •List features explicitly NOT included
- •Agree on a change request process
- •Set a hard deadline that doesn't move
During Development
- •Every new idea goes to a "v2 list"—not MVP
- •Weekly scope check: is anything new creeping in?
- •Cost every change request in days and euros
- •Ask: does this help us validate the core hypothesis?
The One Question Test
For every proposed addition, ask: "Will we fail to validate our idea without this?" If no, it's not MVP.
When to Allow Scope Changes
- •Critical bug or security issue discovered
- •Payment provider requires additional flow
- •Legal/compliance requirement identified
- •Core user flow simply doesn't work
The best MVPs are embarrassingly small at launch. If you're not slightly uncomfortable with how little it does, you've probably overbuilt.